Comparison dialog between Dragon and WSR

[m***@gmail.com]

See the speech computing forum at:
http://www.speechcomputing.com/node/2194#comment-9426

for an interesting dialog on the comparison between the $100.00 and
higher Dragon NaturallySpeaking and the FREE WSR (Windows Speech
Recognition) built into the Vista operating system.

Martin Markoe
See us at: http://www.mymsspeech.com

[John Doe]

Longtime regular spammer and troll

See also:
Google Groups
billyrichbroker yahoo.com
M.M. <twatface41 yahoo.com>
mmarkoe gmail.com
mmarkoe yahoo.com
Martin Markoe <martin emicrophones.com>
Martin Markoe <martin speechcontrol.com>
Martin Markoe <mmarkoe optonline.net>
Michael Mendick <michael emicrophones.com>
NEWSGROUP DESTROYER <twatface41 yahoo.com>
wbonneau gmail.com


Path: nlpi102-int.nbdc.sbc.com!nlpi062.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!l76g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: mmarkoe gmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.speech.users
Subject: Comparison dialog between Dragon and WSR
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <6f1bb8dc-4c57-434b-a3a6-79c86e0e620a l76g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.87.76.112
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1224682014 22277 127.0.0.1 (22 Oct 2008 13:26:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:26:54 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
Injection-Info: l76g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.87.76.112; posting-account=wCRjrwoAAAD8nAAOusCMQoFPZqKsecHb
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Bytes: 1468
Xref: prodigy.net comp.speech.users:15338
X-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:26:54 EDT (nlpi102-int.nbdc.sbc.com)

See the speech computing forum at:
http://www.speechcomputing.com/node/2194#comment-9426

for an interesting dialog on the comparison between the $100.00 and
higher Dragon NaturallySpeaking and the FREE WSR (Windows Speech
Recognition) built into the Vista operating system.

Martin Markoe
See us at: http://www.mymsspeech.com

[Richard Owlett]

John *SHUT UP*
Free speech is constitutional protected.
If you don't like him, you don't have to read his post.
You are acting like a two year old spoiled brat that needs a "timeout".

[John Doe]

Post by Richard Owlett
John *SHUT UP*
Free speech is constitutional protected.
If you don't like him, you don't have to read his post.
You are acting like a two year old spoiled brat that needs a "timeout".

You just made another incoherent mess, Richard Owlett,
not even befitting a two-year-old.

Post by Richard Owlett
Path: nlpi102-int.nbdc.sbc.com!flpi088.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!flpi089.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!newshub.sdsu.edu!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:34:11 -0500
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:35:30 -0500
From: Richard Owlett <rowlett atlascomm.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.speech.users
Subject: Re: Comparison dialog between Dragon and WSR
References: <6f1bb8dc-4c57-434b-a3a6-79c86e0e620a l76g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <aWFLk.4098$as4.648 nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>
In-Reply-To: <aWFLk.4098$as4.648 nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <P9GdnblrhKt-pGLVnZ2dnUVZ_sPinZ2d supernews.com>
Lines: 4
X-Trace: sv3-nxJOGttt6bTZ4SMkcN8/63+Z6/FG70vBScgPph+FN0Yb6KkmLZMIWtBzSvGK/Zv4WHDSFama/bYRepA!F3UVgTUIi+ehaC5ydjKkmwsQcbBAeyRBPiiB1vhdZNYKBxCCoAQQiuKEnknKHhi5YiKYwoIX3ptG!IU+CuWh48g==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
Xref: prodigy.net comp.speech.users:15340
X-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:35:18 EDT (nlpi102-int.nbdc.sbc.com)

[Hubert Crépy]

Post by Richard Owlett
John *SHUT UP*
Free speech is constitutional protected.
If you don't like him, you don't have to read his post.
You are acting like a two year old spoiled brat that needs a "timeout".

I agree with the general sentiment, but:
1/ "shut up" and "free speech" don't go well side by side
2/ the (US, I assume) constitution has little relevance to a worldwide
medium as is Usenet

;-)

(long time I didn't come around here, this place is all but dead)

[John Doe]

Post by Hubert Crépy

Post by Richard Owlett
John *SHUT UP*
Free speech is constitutional protected.
If you don't like him, you don't have to read his post.
You are acting like a two year old spoiled brat that needs a
"timeout".

I agree with the general sentiment,

That's strange, since I'm sure you were here back when Marty used to
compete with other spammers in this group. You should know that spam
is prohibited on USENET, partly because of the major problems it
causes.

Post by Hubert Crépy
1/ "shut up" and "free speech" don't go well side by side
2/ the (US, I assume) constitution has little relevance to a
worldwide medium as is Usenet

It's just another Richard Owlett incoherent rant.

Post by Hubert Crépy
;-)
(long time I didn't come around here, this place is all but dead)

You aren't being helpful either.

Post by Hubert Crépy
--
Hubert Cr‚py
Path: nlpi059.nbdc.sbc.com!nlpi062.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!

nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!news2!feeder.erje.net!
fdn.fr!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!cleanfeed4-
a.proxad.net!nnrp18-2.free.fr!not-for-mail

Post by Hubert Crépy
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:12:03 +0200
From: Hubert Cr‚py <no.spam for.me>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.speech.users
Subject: Re: Comparison dialog between Dragon and WSR
References: <6f1bb8dc-4c57-434b-a3a6-79c86e0e620a

l76g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <aWFLk.4098$as4.648 nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>
<P9GdnblrhKt-pGLVnZ2dnUVZ_sPinZ2d supernews.com>

Post by Hubert Crépy
In-Reply-To: <P9GdnblrhKt-pGLVnZ2dnUVZ_sPinZ2d supernews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <48ff8913$0$6998$426a74cc news.free.fr>
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Oct 2008 22:12:03 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.61.151.169
X-Trace: 1224706323 news-1.free.fr 6998 90.61.151.169:3405
X-Complaints-To: abuse proxad.net
Xref: prodigy.net comp.speech.users:15343
X-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:12:03 EDT (nlpi059.nbdc.sbc.com)

[Hubert Crépy]

Post by John Doe

Post by Hubert Crépy
I agree with the general sentiment,

That's strange, since I'm sure you were here back when Marty used to
compete with other spammers in this group. You should know that spam
is prohibited on USENET, partly because of the major problems it
causes.

I was, and I used to appreciate some of the very constructive advice
Marty was giving on microphones and proper speech recognition usage,
while I was being disturbed by your hostile campaign against him, which
you apparently haven't relented on, a few years later.

There is a point when this kind of obstination borders on pathological...

[John Doe]

Post by Hubert Crépy

Post by John Doe

Post by Hubert Crépy
I agree with the general sentiment,

That's strange, since I'm sure you were here back when Marty used
to compete with other spammers in this group. You should know
that spam is prohibited on USENET, partly because of the major
problems it causes.

I was,

Yes you were, Hubert Crépy, at least "lurking".

Post by Hubert Crépy
and I used to appreciate some of the very constructive advice
Marty was giving on microphones and proper speech recognition
usage,

But of course "constructive advice" isn't what we are talking about.
Maybe "competing with other spammers" doesn't translate well into
French? Maybe remembering the death of ViaVoice is too unpleasant
for you, Hubert Crépy?

Post by Hubert Crépy
while I was being disturbed by your hostile campaign against him,

Unfortunately, this group (like your ViaVoice, Hubert Crépy) was
already dead by the time I arrived.

Post by Hubert Crépy
which you apparently haven't relented on, a few years later.

Spam has no place on USENET, Hubert Crépy, as you should know. Is
that not true in French groups?

Post by Hubert Crépy
There is a point when this kind of obstination borders on
pathological...

Like when a spammer threatens legal action and hires a private
investigator (Kelmar & Associates) to attack the character of his
adversaries. The only difference is I haven't been intimidated like
the others were.

Post by Hubert Crépy
--
Hubert "crawling back into my cave now" Cr‚py
Path: flpi141.ffdc.sbc.com!flpi088.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!flpi089.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!newshub.sdsu.edu!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed3-b.proxad.net!nnrp3-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:26:25 +0200
From: Hubert Cr‚py <no.spam for.me>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.speech.users
Subject: Re: Comparison dialog between Dragon and WSR
References: <6f1bb8dc-4c57-434b-a3a6-79c86e0e620a l76g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <aWFLk.4098$as4.648 nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> <P9GdnblrhKt-pGLVnZ2dnUVZ_sPinZ2d supernews.com> <48ff8913$0$6998$426a74cc news.free.fr> <D4MLk.4515$c45.2363 nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com>
In-Reply-To: <D4MLk.4515$c45.2363 nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <48ffa892$0$7697$426a74cc news.free.fr>
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Oct 2008 00:26:26 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.61.151.169
X-Trace: 1224714386 news-1.free.fr 7697 90.61.151.169:4145
X-Complaints-To: abuse proxad.net
Xref: prodigy.net comp.speech.users:15345
X-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:23:26 EDT (flpi141.ffdc.sbc.com)

[Hubert Crépy]

Post by John Doe

Post by Hubert Crépy

Post by John Doe

Post by Hubert Crépy
I agree with the general sentiment,

That's strange, since I'm sure you were here back when Marty used
to compete with other spammers in this group. You should know
that spam is prohibited on USENET, partly because of the major
problems it causes.

I was,

Yes you were, Hubert Crépy, at least "lurking".

I used to contribute too, when appropriate.

Post by John Doe

Post by Hubert Crépy
and I used to appreciate some of the very constructive advice
Marty was giving on microphones and proper speech recognition
usage,

But of course "constructive advice" isn't what we are talking about.
Maybe "competing with other spammers" doesn't translate well into
French? Maybe remembering the death of ViaVoice is too unpleasant
for you, Hubert Crépy?

Don't worry about translation. I may not speak English very well, but I
can manage to understand it well enough to spot an ad-hominem attack and
recognize underlying xenophobia.

Yes, the "death" of ViaVoice was unpleasant to us, but I fail to see how
it relates to your little war with Marty.

(snip the rest, and EOT for me, it's too hard to follow -since I've
blocked you, I need to go hunt-and-peck for your posts- and it leads
nowhere.)

[John Doe]

Post by Hubert Crépy

Post by John Doe

Post by Hubert Crépy

I'm sure you were here back when Marty used to compete with
other spammers in this group. You should know that spam is
prohibited on USENET, partly because of the major problems it
causes.

and I used to appreciate some of the very constructive advice
Marty was giving on microphones and proper speech recognition usage,

But of course "constructive advice" isn't what we are talking
about. Maybe "competing with other spammers" doesn't translate
well into French? Maybe remembering the death of ViaVoice is too
unpleasant for you, Hubert Crépy?

Don't worry about translation. I may not speak English very well,
but I can manage to understand it well enough

Then what part of "Spam has no place on USENET" don't you
understand, Hubert Crépy? Is spam allowed in French groups?

Post by Hubert Crépy
Yes, the "death" of ViaVoice was unpleasant to us, but I fail to
see how it relates to your little war with Marty.

You were disturbed by my stern criticism of ViaVoice, Hubert Crépy.

It's not just my war with Marty, it's the disruptive anti-productive
war that erupts between Marty and his competition here (when this
group is active). This group like the vast majority of USENET groups
is not for advertising. This is not a forum for advertising or
competition among vendors.

Post by Hubert Crépy
(snip the rest, and EOT for me, it's too hard to follow -since
I've blocked you, I need to go hunt-and-peck for your posts- and
it leads nowhere.)

Imaginary kill file friends are difficult to manage.

[m***@gmail.com]

John (Mark),

Post by John Doe
Then what part of "Spam has no place on USENET" don't you
understand, Hubert Crépy? Is spam allowed in French groups?

There is an overtone of xenophobia in your response. As you well know,
the Internet is world wide and not limited to one country.

Apparently you are the only person who deems links to products and
websites as SPAM. You do this yourself, see the bottom of your post
where you wrote:
--
The first big front wheel rollerblades.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/***@N04/2565924423/

Martin Markoe
http://www.mymsspeech.com

[John Doe]

Post by m***@gmail.com

Post by John Doe
Then what part of "Spam has no place on USENET" don't you
understand, Hubert Crépy? Is spam allowed in French groups?

There is an overtone of xenophobia in your response.

Says a spammer who oftentimes displays the intellect of a
preschooler (no offense intended to preschoolers).

Post by m***@gmail.com
Apparently you are the only person who deems links to products and
websites as SPAM.

Once again, Martin Markoe is going back to the old bullshit
(pretending to be ignorant) routine.

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.speech.users/msg/3becc9fa6c340ffc?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.speech.users/msg/473a2b3f9dd6a0f0?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.speech.users/msg/d256b8b7563712e9?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.speech.users/msg/6014c0e38032578f?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.speech.users/msg/3b57c2d47a1d5994?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.speech.users/msg/ce73180162c1d199?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.speech.users/msg/ba6cc5fd879272fd?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.speech.users/msg/84f362b69d93a460?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.speech.users/msg/5585a5e972b1cc1c?
Message-ID: <4izmd.5595$hc5.3040881 news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>
Message-ID: <ERAmd.5863$hc5.3319179 news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>
Message-ID: <u4ro9qhmt66rfd corp.supernews.com>
Message-ID: <9v2ppt02td9 drn.newsguy.com>
Message-ID: <9v2odo02p6i drn.newsguy.com>
Message-ID: <MPG.167f9499723e210a98968b 192.168.0.2>
Message-ID: <979d3d17.0111231011.5997abbd posting.google.com>
Message-ID: <MPG.163c7c1328a592e1989687 news.earthlink.net>

Post by m***@gmail.com
You do this yourself,

We have been through all this many times before, Martin Markoe. Over
and over and over again, you forever play dumb. Doesn't matter what
the issue or how well it has been resolved, Martin Markoe remembers
and understands nothing except that which helps sell his products.

Regular USENET users do not post links to commercial websites except
occasionally when replying to a legitimate poster (as opposed to a
spammer's accomplice) who is requesting information about buying
something.

We avoid posting links to commercial websites. As I have pointed out
countless times before, an exception is if those links are confined
to a proper USENET signature of four lines or less. That's
acceptable, but even that is not common.

Those are universally accepted practices here on USENET, and this
group's history (see the message IDs and hyperlinks above) provides
a shining example of why spam is prohibited here. You are not
helping anyone when your answers are designed to sell something.

[m***@gmail.com]

John Doe (Mark Bender) wrote:
"Once again, Martin Markoe is going back to the old bullshit
(pretending to be ignorant) routine."

Let me get this straight, giving good information (an offshoot of good
business) is SPAM according to you? However, foul language is
perfectly OK? Am I missing something here Mr. Bender?

Martin

[m***@gmail.com]

Post by John Doe
Once again, Martin Markoe is going back to the old bullshit
(pretending to be ignorant) routine.

Hmm??? You accuse me of SPAM because I provide links to information
and products. Yet your sense of rules and propriety on the Internet
does not extend to foul language. You are working on a double standard
not even you can live up to.

Martin